Logo
登入
<<<

名稱: 密碼:

加入 | FAQ | 聯絡我們
全部區域 > 靈修與祈禱生活 > 每日禮讚分享 > 聖巴西略大主教:論聖神–主在聖神內使自己的身體生活

頁:  1 回 應
作者 內容

Ignatius


Posted -
2006/1/2 下午 09:35:09

聖巴西略大主教:論聖神–主在聖神內使自己的身體生活

凡已經不再按肉性生活,但隨天主聖神領導而行動的人,被稱為天主之子,而肖似天主子,這樣的人可稱為屬神的人。正如一個人的視力寓於健全的眼目中,同樣,聖神的工作也是在潔淨的靈魂上。

同樣,言語在人心中,有如在心�堳鉿牷A有時從口中發出。天主聖神,也是如此:祂有時在我們心中為我們作證,在我們心�堜I喊說:「阿爸,父啊!」有時祂也代替我們說話,一如聖經所載:「那說話的不是你們,而是你們父的聖神,在你們內說話。」

此外,聖神給我們分施祂的恩寵,由此我們認出祂與我們的關係是整體與其部分的關係。因為我們眾人互為一個身體的肢體,但我們每個人按天主所賦予的恩寵,各有不同的恩賜。

因此,「眼不能對手說:我不需要你;頭也不能對腳說:我不需要你們。」但所有肢體都在聖神內團結一致,形成基督的身體,按照各自接受的恩賜,而互相服務。

因為是天主按自己的旨意,在一個身體上配置了不同的肢體。但不同的肢體彼此互相關懷,他們之間有一種精神的共融,使他們彼此間同甘共苦。因此,「如果一個肢體受苦,則所有的肢體都一樣受苦;如果一個肢體蒙受尊榮,則所有的肢體都一同歡樂。」

再者,就如每個部份都在同一個整體中;同樣,我們眾人,都在聖神內,因為我們所有組成這同一身體的人,都曾因同一聖神受洗。

就如我們在子內見到父,同樣,我們在聖神內見到子。因此,我們在聖神內的崇拜就是表示我們心神的活動是在光明中展開的。我們可以從基督對撒瑪黎雅婦人講的話明瞭這個道理。因為,那時候,撒瑪黎雅婦人按習慣的想法,誤認為,崇拜天主該在一定的地方。但主開導她說:「那些真正朝拜的人,將以心神以真理朝拜父。」這�堜珨〞滲u理,無疑地是指基督自己。

正如我們說,在子內朝拜天父,即在天主父的肖像內朝拜天父;同樣,我們在聖神內朝拜父,因為聖神是主之神性的顯示。

所以,確切而合理的說話,我們是藉聖神的光照,看到子–天主的榮耀;我們是藉著子–父的戳記,而被領到那一位跟前,祂就是這戳記及印鑑的原始。

Cecil


Posted -
2006/1/3 上午 10:40:29

A sermon by St Gregory Nazianzen
Two bodies, but a single spirit

Basil and I were both in Athens. We had come, like streams of a river, from the same source in our native land, had separated from each other in pursuit of learning, and were now united again as if by plan, for God so arranged it.

I was not alone at that time in my regard for my friend, the great Basil. I knew his irreproachable conduct, and the maturity and wisdom of his conversation. I sought to persuade others, to whom he was less well known, to have the same regard for him. Many fell immediately under his spell, for they had already heard of him by reputation and hearsay.

What was the outcome? Almost alone of those who had come to Athens to study he was exempted from the customary ceremonies of initiation for he was held in higher honour than his status as a first-year student seemed to warrant.

Such was the prelude to our friendship, the kindling of that flame that was to bind us together. In this way we began to feel affection for each other. When, in the course of time, we acknowledged our friendship and recognised that our ambition was a life of true wisdom, we became everything to each other: we shared the same lodging, the same table, the same desires the same goal. Our love for each other grew daily warmer and deeper.

The same hope inspired us: the pursuit of learning. This is an ambition especially subject to envy. Yet between us there was no envy. On the contrary, we made capital out of our rivalry. Our rivalry consisted, not in seeking the first place for oneself but in yielding it to the other, for we each looked on the other’s success as his own.
We seemed to be two bodies with a single spirit. Though we cannot believe those who claim that everything is contained in everything, yet you must believe that in our case each of us was in the other and with the other.

Our single object and ambition was virtue, and a life of hope in the blessings that are to come; we wanted to withdraw from this world before we departed from it. With this end in view we ordered our lives and all our actions. We followed the guidance of God’s law and spurred each other on to virtue. If it is not too boastful to say, we found in each other a standard and rule for discerning right from wrong.
Different men have different names, which they owe to their parents or to themselves, that is, to their own pursuits and achievements. But our great pursuit, the great name we wanted, was to be Christians, to be called Christians.

頁:  1 回 應